[OSM-dev] Polygons and Multipolygons
artem.mapnik at googlemail.com
Fri Feb 8 12:06:20 GMT 2008
On 8 Feb 2008, at 11:50, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>> I found the way term 'Multipolygon' is used in OSM context is
> True. What we had been looking for was a term for "polygons with
> holes"; it seemed unreasonable to create a relation "type=polygon"
> as plain polygons, without holes, don't require relations. But
> multipolygon is somewhat of a misnomer.
>> Shouldn't we be calling MultiPolygon Polygon?
> There are only 2788 in the database so it would not be too hard to
> change. I wanted to automatically add the "inner" and "outer" flags
> to the existing polygons anyway, although they're not strictly
> required they would make processing easier for some.
I think having 'outer' and 'inner' flags/tags will help at the data
entry stage as well.
> Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00.09' E008°
More information about the dev