[OSM-dev] Distributed Data Store Follow-Up
scott.shawcroft at gmail.com
Tue Mar 24 17:52:54 GMT 2009
Our update performance shouldn't be too different. We simply send the
update request to all the node machines.
By within do you mean a bounding box query? Could you be more specific?
Stefan de Konink wrote:
> Scott Shawcroft wrote:
>> Please let us know what you think. We firmly believe that
>> distributing the data over a number of computers is a far better
>> solution than one single supercomputer.
> This conclusion (divide and conquer) is right for fetch. What was your
> update performance?
> Did you explore the performance of within queries?
More information about the dev