[OSM-dev] Grumble, grumble
Stefan de Konink
stefan at konink.de
Mon May 11 09:05:25 BST 2009
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Stefan de Konink wrote:
> > If 0.6 is a transaction based system, the transaction should be stored
> > server side in a changeset right?
> I don't think any transaction based system stores aborted transactions?
But is the transaction aborted? If so it could never be resolved :)
> > In anycase; I think what should happen is a resultset upon closing of
> > the changeset that would show you the conflicts.
> As documented in
> information about the first conflict only will be returned.
Ok this is *bad*; because I assume this is based upon a failure instead of
a check. What imho should happen is an active check for the records begin
inserted and preferably gracefully remove changes that have been applied
already if they have the same outcome.
More information about the dev