<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16481" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The dutch people most involved are now also reading
this list, esp.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>these threads.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>For checking the OSM and AND data I made this
animated</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>gif ( 1004x1060 pixel, 345k ) which shows the
differences:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><A
href="http://floris.nu/osm/texel/alkmaar_de_hoef.gif">http://floris.nu/osm/texel/alkmaar_de_hoef.gif</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Well actually there's very little differences. I
mapped this area</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>so I know it well. It seems that AND has some
cycleways defined</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>as normal ways, and i also see some normal roads
defined as</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>pedestrian but that might also be my mistake in
interpreting the</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>AND data format.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>greetings,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>floris looijesteijn</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=huybkoen@gmail.com href="mailto:huybkoen@gmail.com">koko</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=osm@floris.nu
href="mailto:osm@floris.nu">Floris Looijesteijn</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A title=dev@openstreetmap.org
href="mailto:dev@openstreetmap.org">'OSM-Dev Openstreetmap'</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, July 18, 2007 5:22
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [OSM-dev] AND data
integration</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Floris Looijesteijn schreef:
<BLOCKQUOTE cite=mid003101c7c94e$83d142f0$c701a8c0@flaptop type="cite">
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><PRE wrap="">A fourth way may be a bit painful, but may also be most efficient and lead
to the most consistant map.
- Save the map we have now
- replace it with the AND data
- add the cycleway and foothpaths, etc, connect them
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap=""><!---->
That may prove to be the best (but for some very painful) solution.
There's no way we can do everything automatically. We always will
have to manually connect the old to the new ways.
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE>Hi,<BR><BR>I also think this is the best way. It will be
much more work an give a lot more problems to split and merge.<BR><BR>Is
suggest someone send a message on [OSM-talk-nl] to explain the in clear words
the 4 possibilities, because not all of them will <BR>be reading this list and
it are they who did most of the work on the
Netherlands.<BR><BR>koko<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>