<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div>Hi,</div><br><div><div>Am 10.11.2012 um 18:01 schrieb Kai Krueger <<a href="mailto:kakrueger@gmail.com">kakrueger@gmail.com</a>>:</div><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Do you know by chance what unit "ModTileMaxLoadMissing" uses? Is it a<br>percentage? The settings for the log below were as follows:<br></blockquote><br>The load is in units of "number of processes that are wanting CPU time". It<br>is the load number you get from /proc/loadavg. So if you have a load average<br>of 500 on a 1 core system, then each process only gets 1/500th of a CPU and<br>will be dog slow. The load numbers should therefor typically be not too much<br>more than the number of CPU cores you have. Therefore unless something is<br>drastically wrong with your server, you really shouldn't be seeing a load of<br>500. <br></blockquote></div><div><br></div><div>I compiled mod_tile again with svn-r28921 containing today's change from apmon which writes the actual load into error.log. The result is strange:</div><br><div><b><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>[info] [client xx.xx.xx.xx] Load (1202590843) larger max_load_missing (500000). Return HTTP_NOT_FOUND., referer: <a href="http://xxxx.xxxx.xx/">http://xxxx.xxxx.xx/</a></b></div><div><br></div><div>Quite some high load, isn't it? I hadn't time yet to dig deeper but will do that the coming days. If in the meantime someone has an idea: feel free to share :-)</div><div><br></div><div>Greetings, Stefan</div></body></html>