<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
20. Jun 2018 16:50 by <a href="mailto:jochen@remote.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">jochen@remote.org</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">The law shouldn't be applicable to what we<br />are doing here</blockquote><p><br /></p><p>If you think that law is wrong and should be modified I suggest lobbying elsewhere</p><p>than on mailing list discussing technical issues related to OSM.<br /></p><p> </p><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">we have already lost the political case and the legal case, and broken<br />the openness this project needs.<br /></blockquote><p><br /></p><p>Personally, I see no breaking openess in slightly restricting how</p><p>detailed history info is distributed and recording that changeset data <br /></p><p>is not supposed to be used for stalking mappers.<br /></p> </body>
</html>