<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hey ratrun,<br>
<br>
really no problem. As you already noted this was also more or less
a limitation of graphhopper - will be improved in the issue you
mentioned.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Peter.<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:5361F7FB.6000402@gmx.at" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
Hello Peter,<br>
<br>
During the introduction of support for bicycle relations the
weighting of highways of type cycleway, which are not part of a
bicycle relation, unintentionally decreased in comparison to the
previous versions. I guess that this is the difference you are
seeing, because in the Benelux there are lots of cycleways. <br>
Peter intends to introduce a "preference routing" feature shortly
- see <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/190">https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/190</a>,
and I hope that this feature will allow easier tuning between the
"fastest" and the "safest, nice" route.<br>
<br>
regards,<br>
<br>
ratrun<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 30.04.2014 22:33, schrieb Peter
Bryan:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CADU5_BH4HShh2pdCzUBeBkDtMpCmp2zvuyekh0xjaOzGqAS3pA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>
<div>Hi all,<br>
<br>
</div>
The last few days (weeks?) I've noticed that graphhopper
routes for bicycles seem to have changed. Previously,
graphhopper would take more bike friendly roads like
bicycle paths or quiet roads. Routes created today seem to
take bigger and busier roads, most suitable for cars. Is
there something wrong with bicycle routing? Of course, I
prefer cycle paths over busy roads.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>I've uploaded an example on GPS Visualizer with an old
and a new route between the same locations: <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.gpsvisualizer.com/display/20140430130842-45066-map.html">http://www.gpsvisualizer.com/display/20140430130842-45066-map.html</a><br>
<br>
The old track (created in March) is much better than the
route I created today. I've tried this on GPSies and <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://graphhopper.com/maps">graphhopper.com/maps</a>
with the same results. Routing between other locations
have the same problem.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
Thanks for looking into this!<br>
<br>
</div>
Peter<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>