<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hmmh, that is a common problem: it is a
      cycleway and foot is not explicitely allowed there. So strictly
      speaking this is correct according to the mapping.<br>
      <br>
      I understand the problem and I also found places where this was
      ugly for myself. At the same time there are places where it is
      important to keep walking people off this road. What we could do
      is allow access but make it AVOID_AT_ALL_COSTS.<br>
      <br>
      Peter.<br>
      <br>
      <br>
      On 11.11.2014 23:51, D KING wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:1415746303.87149.YahooMailNeo@web87904.mail.ir2.yahoo.com"
      type="cite">
      <div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff;
        font-family:garamond, new york, times, serif;font-size:8pt">
        <div>We have many shared use paths in our local area, but these
          are only available within the current Graphhopper Maps
          implementation within the cycling mode. They are usually
          useful walking routes, often the only available footpath links
          across rivers.<br>
          <br>
          We have a Sustrans cycle route on the alignment of the old
          railway from Bath>Bristol, and also the riverside towpath,
          both of which are unavailable for walking routes within
          Graphhopper.<br>
          <br>
          (Correct alignment in cycling) <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=51.430789%2C-2.475915&point=51.412966%2C-2.455616&point=51.390744%2C-2.422142&point=51.381853%2C-2.390213&point=51.384022%2C-2.381823&point=51.379656%2C-2.367382&point=51.378585%2C-2.363906&point=51.377647%2C-2.35086&point=51.388361%2C-2.347877&point=51.392351%2C-2.339101&point=51.396742%2C-2.316699&point=51.394011%2C-2.313566&vehicle=bike&elevation=true&layer=TF%20Outdoors">https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=51.430789%2C-2.475915&point=51.412966%2C-2.455616&point=51.390744%2C-2.422142&point=51.381853%2C-2.390213&point=51.384022%2C-2.381823&point=51.379656%2C-2.367382&point=51.378585%2C-2.363906&point=51.377647%2C-2.35086&point=51.388361%2C-2.347877&point=51.392351%2C-2.339101&point=51.396742%2C-2.316699&point=51.394011%2C-2.313566&vehicle=bike&elevation=true&layer=TF%20Outdoors</a><br>
          <br>
          (Incorrectly missing the walking possibilities)<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=51.430789%2C-2.475915&point=51.412966%2C-2.455616&point=51.390744%2C-2.422142&point=51.381853%2C-2.390213&point=51.384022%2C-2.381823&point=51.379656%2C-2.367382&point=51.378585%2C-2.363906&point=51.377647%2C-2.35086&point=51.388361%2C-2.347877&point=51.392351%2C-2.339101&point=51.396742%2C-2.316699&point=51.394011%2C-2.313566&vehicle=foot&elevation=true&layer=TF%20Outdoors">https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=51.430789%2C-2.475915&point=51.412966%2C-2.455616&point=51.390744%2C-2.422142&point=51.381853%2C-2.390213&point=51.384022%2C-2.381823&point=51.379656%2C-2.367382&point=51.378585%2C-2.363906&point=51.377647%2C-2.35086&point=51.388361%2C-2.347877&point=51.392351%2C-2.339101&point=51.396742%2C-2.316699&point=51.394011%2C-2.313566&vehicle=foot&elevation=true&layer=TF%20Outdoors</a><br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>