<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hi Stuart,<br>
<br>
thanks for the follow up! When I introduced the pillar node /
tower node difference I got ~7 times faster code which makes your
high numbers of ~30secs explainable.<br>
<br>
> This is an easy fix however does seem to break some of ITN's
turning restrictions<br>
<br>
How do you mean that? Is that just hard to implement or do you see
a GraphHopper limitation?<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Peter<br>
<br>
On 28.11.2014 11:19, Stuart Adam wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:DUB119-W44964FD080E2B64760A6D2BA7E0@phx.gbl"
type="cite">
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style>
<div dir="ltr">As I suspected part of the issue with our speed
when not using contraction hierarchies is that currently our
code is introducing all nodes as towers rather than a mix of
towers and pillars. This is an easy fix however does seem to
break some of ITN's turning restrictions so I won't be commiting
that yet. Obviously correct and legal is better than fast :-)<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>