<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body ><div><div></div><div>Yes definitely! </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><div style="font-size:75%;color:#575757">Sent from Samsung Mobile</div></div></div> <br><br><br>-------- Original message --------<br>From: Peter <graphhopper@gmx.de> <br>Date: <br>To: graphhopper@openstreetmap.org <br>Subject: [GraphHopper] What are pillar and tower Nodes? Rename to geometry
and junction nodes? <br> <br><br>Hi all,<br><br>as the naming is from 2 years ago I think it could be time to rename<br>'tower' nodes into 'junction' nodes and 'pillar' nodes into 'geometry'<br>nodes. What do you think, would this be (more) intuitive?<br><br>Below a quick documentation which I would add otherwise to the docs.<br><br>Kind Regards,<br>Peter<br><br>**<br>From OpenStreetMap we fetch all nodes and create the routing graph but<br>only a minority of them are actual junctions, which are the ones we are<br>interested while routing. Those junction nodes I call tower nodes which<br>also have a graphhopper node ID associated, going from 0 to<br>graph.getNodes(). The helper nodes between the junctions I call 'pillar<br>nodes' which can be fetched via edgeIteratorState.fetchWayGeometry<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>GraphHopper mailing list<br>GraphHopper@openstreetmap.org<br>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper<br></body>