<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hi Marc,<br>
<br>
off-the-list you have posted this example:<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=53.077057%2C8.836741&point=53.076918%2C8.836613&vehicle=bike&elevation=true&layer=Lyrk">https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=53.077057%2C8.836741&point=53.076918%2C8.836613&vehicle=bike&elevation=true&layer=Lyrk</a><br>
<br>
> As we add more detail to OSM, people start to draw them as
separate lines<br>
<br>
That is a tough problem.<br>
<br>
If there is only a distinct connection from cycleway to the main
street you should map it as one or more connecting streets. If
there is a free and accessible area between the cycleway and the
main street and this area can be crossed by bike or (only) foot
you should map it as such. Although we currently do not support
area routing, it should not be that hard to add:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/82">https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/82</a><br>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>> Another problem is that those cycleways have no name,
while it would be nice that the name of the street would taken.
<br>
> The might be solved with the Lübeck scheme that uses the
street-relation to bring all parts together.<br>
<br>
Do you have a link to that schema?<br>
</div>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Peter<br>
<br>
<br>
On 07.12.2014 08:10, Marc Gemis wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAJKJX-QdrOb088BJ18On-tukWNwYPqnBL6AmD=uS_2bOT14N_A@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Hallo,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I was wondering how one can improve the mapping in case of
cycleways that run parallel to the main road. Those cycleways
were originally tagged as cycleway=track on the main road. As
we add more detail to OSM, people start to draw them as
separate lines. There is no indication whether it is possible
to cross the (main) road at all times. This is the case when
the cycleway is just on the kerb, without physical barrier,
such as an hedge or ditch.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Are there ideas to tackle this problem ? A tag
"street_can_be_crossed" on the cycleway ?<br>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Another problem is that those cycleways have no name,
while it would be nice that the name of the street would
taken. The might be solved with the Lübeck scheme that
uses the street-relation to bring all parts together.</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>regards</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>m</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
GraphHopper mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:GraphHopper@openstreetmap.org">GraphHopper@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>