<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">As a workaround for routing, yes. But I
don't like the idea to map for routers :)<br>
<br>
If these cases are happening very often we could try to merge the
cycleways while import with their main streets<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Peter<br>
<br>
On 09.12.2014 16:10, Marc Gemis wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAJKJX-SYGhKrmZ87s2xBoYJm61yTt+hFnpmosN3-LeccWhpu-w@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">The cases I'm thinking about are like number 6 on <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bremen/Radverkehrsanlagen">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bremen/Radverkehrsanlagen</a>
<div>So it might be best to keep them as cycleway=track on the
main street in those cases. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>regards</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>m</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Peter <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:graphhopper@gmx.de" target="_blank">graphhopper@gmx.de</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div>Thanks for the links!<br>
<br>
This is really complex matter when I think more about
it. As the street itself could be too dangerous to pass
or with a fence to avoid (bike/pedestrian) crossing<span
class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Peter</font></span>
<div>
<div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
On 09.12.2014 15:51, Marc Gemis wrote:<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div class="h5">
<div dir="ltr">BTW, it seems like there is some
interest in this topic on the German mailing list
as well, under the title "cycleway=track bei
Bordstein Trennung" [1]
<div>it is more general than what I was asking
for.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>regards</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>m</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>[1] <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2014-December/109941.html"
target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2014-December/109941.html</a></div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at
2:22 PM, Marc Gemis <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:marc.gemis@gmail.com"
target="_blank">marc.gemis@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0
0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote"><span>On Tue, Dec
9, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Peter <span
dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:graphhopper@gmx.de"
target="_blank">graphhopper@gmx.de</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"
text="#000000">
<div>Hi Marc,<br>
<br>
off-the-list you have posted
this example:<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=53.077057%2C8.836741&point=53.076918%2C8.836613&vehicle=bike&elevation=true&layer=Lyrk"
target="_blank">https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=53.077057%2C8.836741&point=53.076918%2C8.836613&vehicle=bike&elevation=true&layer=Lyrk</a><span><br>
<br>
> As we add more detail to
OSM, people start to draw them
as separate lines<br>
<br>
</span> That is a tough problem.<br>
<br>
If there is only a distinct
connection from cycleway to the
main street you should map it as
one or more connecting streets.
If there is a free and
accessible area between the
cycleway and the main street and
this area can be crossed by bike
or (only) foot you should map it
as such. Although we currently
do not support area routing, it
should not be that hard to add:
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/82"
target="_blank">https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/82</a></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
</span>
<div>It seems closely related to
landuse=highway, but it is not the
same. This weekend I'l see a number of
Belgian mappers. I'll try to discuss
it there as well.</div>
<span>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"
text="#000000">
<div><br>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><span>> Another problem
is that those cycleways have
no name, while it would be
nice that the name of the
street would taken. <br>
> The might be solved
with the Lübeck scheme that
uses the street-relation to
bring all parts together.<br>
<br>
</span> Do you have a link to
that schema?<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
</span>
<div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/L%C3%BCbeck/Fahrradstadtplan#Radwege-Mapping_in_OpenStreetMap"
target="_blank">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/L%C3%BCbeck/Fahrradstadtplan#Radwege-Mapping_in_OpenStreetMap</a>
(in German)<br>
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>regards</div>
<span><font color="#888888">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>m</div>
</font></span></div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>