<div dir="ltr">The cases I'm thinking about are like number 6 on <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bremen/Radverkehrsanlagen">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bremen/Radverkehrsanlagen</a><div>So it might be best to keep them as cycleway=track on the main street in those cases. </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>regards</div><div><br></div><div>m</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Peter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:graphhopper@gmx.de" target="_blank">graphhopper@gmx.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div>Thanks for the links!<br>
<br>
This is really complex matter when I think more about it. As the
street itself could be too dangerous to pass or with a fence to
avoid (bike/pedestrian) crossing<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Peter</font></span><div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
On 09.12.2014 15:51, Marc Gemis wrote:<br>
</div></div></div>
<blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="h5">
<div dir="ltr">BTW, it seems like there is some interest in this
topic on the German mailing list as well, under the title
"cycleway=track bei Bordstein Trennung" [1]
<div>it is more general than what I was asking for.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>regards</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>m</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>[1] <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2014-December/109941.html" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2014-December/109941.html</a></div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Marc
Gemis <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:marc.gemis@gmail.com" target="_blank">marc.gemis@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote"><span>On Tue, Dec 9,
2014 at 1:42 PM, Peter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:graphhopper@gmx.de" target="_blank">graphhopper@gmx.de</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div>Hi Marc,<br>
<br>
off-the-list you have posted this example:<br>
<a href="https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=53.077057%2C8.836741&point=53.076918%2C8.836613&vehicle=bike&elevation=true&layer=Lyrk" target="_blank">https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=53.077057%2C8.836741&point=53.076918%2C8.836613&vehicle=bike&elevation=true&layer=Lyrk</a><span><br>
<br>
> As we add more detail to OSM, people
start to draw them as separate lines<br>
<br>
</span> That is a tough problem.<br>
<br>
If there is only a distinct connection from
cycleway to the main street you should map it
as one or more connecting streets. If there is
a free and accessible area between the
cycleway and the main street and this area can
be crossed by bike or (only) foot you should
map it as such. Although we currently do not
support area routing, it should not be that
hard to add: <a href="https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/82" target="_blank">https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/82</a></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
</span>
<div>It seems closely related to landuse=highway, but
it is not the same. This weekend I'l see a number of
Belgian mappers. I'll try to discuss it there as
well.</div>
<span>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div><br>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><span>> Another problem is that those
cycleways have no name, while it would be
nice that the name of the street would
taken. <br>
> The might be solved with the Lübeck
scheme that uses the street-relation to
bring all parts together.<br>
<br>
</span> Do you have a link to that schema?<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
</span>
<div><a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/L%C3%BCbeck/Fahrradstadtplan#Radwege-Mapping_in_OpenStreetMap" target="_blank">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/L%C3%BCbeck/Fahrradstadtplan#Radwege-Mapping_in_OpenStreetMap</a>
(in German)<br>
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>regards</div>
<span><font color="#888888">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>m</div>
</font></span></div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
</div></div><span class=""><pre>_______________________________________________
GraphHopper mailing list
<a href="mailto:GraphHopper@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">GraphHopper@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper</a>
</pre>
</span></blockquote>
<br>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
GraphHopper mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:GraphHopper@openstreetmap.org">GraphHopper@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>