<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Sorry, took a bit ;). Let me know if
this fixes your problem:<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/303">https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/303</a><br>
<br>
should be live in 2 days.<br>
<br>
Peter<br>
<br>
<br>
On 13.11.2014 18:36, Bram Duvigneau wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:5464EC1D.8030803@bramd.nl" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hello,<br>
<br>
Of course the situation may be different from region to region,
but I can't think of a cycle way here (Netherlands) that is not
allowed for pedestrians. I also see many streets with separate
cycleways where the sidewalk is next to the cycleway and the
sidewalk is not tagged on the main way, nor on the cycle way. <br>
<br>
In my experience until now planning local pedestrian routes, the
bike profile always gives a better route then the pedestrian
profile.<br>
<br>
Bram<br>
On 13-11-2014 0:56, Peter wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:5463F3C5.509@gmx.de" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html; ">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hmmh, that is a common problem: it
is a cycleway and foot is not explicitely allowed there. So
strictly speaking this is correct according to the mapping.<br>
<br>
I understand the problem and I also found places where this
was ugly for myself. At the same time there are places where
it is important to keep walking people off this road. What we
could do is allow access but make it AVOID_AT_ALL_COSTS.<br>
<br>
Peter.<br>
<br>
<br>
On 11.11.2014 23:51, D KING wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1415746303.87149.YahooMailNeo@web87904.mail.ir2.yahoo.com"
type="cite">
<div>
<div>We have many shared use paths in our local area, but
these are only available within the current Graphhopper
Maps implementation within the cycling mode. They are
usually useful walking routes, often the only available
footpath links across rivers.<br>
<br>
We have a Sustrans cycle route on the alignment of the old
railway from Bath>Bristol, and also the riverside
towpath, both of which are unavailable for walking routes
within Graphhopper.<br>
<br>
(Correct alignment in cycling) <br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=51.430789%2C-2.475915&point=51.412966%2C-2.455616&point=51.390744%2C-2.422142&point=51.381853%2C-2.390213&point=51.384022%2C-2.381823&point=51.379656%2C-2.367382&point=51.378585%2C-2.363906&point=51.377647%2C-2.35086&point=51.388361%2C-2.347877&point=51.392351%2C-2.339101&point=51.396742%2C-2.316699&point=51.394011%2C-2.313566&vehicle=bike&elevation=true&layer=TF%20Outdoors">https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=51.430789%2C-2.475915&point=51.412966%2C-2.455616&point=51.390744%2C-2.422142&point=51.381853%2C-2.390213&point=51.384022%2C-2.381823&point=51.379656%2C-2.367382&point=51.378585%2C-2.363906&point=51.377647%2C-2.35086&point=51.388361%2C-2.347877&point=51.392351%2C-2.339101&point=51.396742%2C-2.316699&point=51.394011%2C-2.313566&vehicle=bike&elevation=true&layer=TF%20Outdoors</a><br>
<br>
(Incorrectly missing the walking possibilities)<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=51.430789%2C-2.475915&point=51.412966%2C-2.455616&point=51.390744%2C-2.422142&point=51.381853%2C-2.390213&point=51.384022%2C-2.381823&point=51.379656%2C-2.367382&point=51.378585%2C-2.363906&point=51.377647%2C-2.35086&point=51.388361%2C-2.347877&point=51.392351%2C-2.339101&point=51.396742%2C-2.316699&point=51.394011%2C-2.313566&vehicle=foot&elevation=true&layer=TF%20Outdoors">https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=51.430789%2C-2.475915&point=51.412966%2C-2.455616&point=51.390744%2C-2.422142&point=51.381853%2C-2.390213&point=51.384022%2C-2.381823&point=51.379656%2C-2.367382&point=51.378585%2C-2.363906&point=51.377647%2C-2.35086&point=51.388361%2C-2.347877&point=51.392351%2C-2.339101&point=51.396742%2C-2.316699&point=51.394011%2C-2.313566&vehicle=foot&elevation=true&layer=TF%20Outdoors</a><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>