<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hi,<br>
<br>
Also took me a while to get back to this.<br>
Assuming the new code is live by now, I don't see much
improvements. Take for example this route:<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=Amsterdamseweg%2C%206816%2C%20Arnhem%2C%20The%20Netherlands&point=Ruiterstraat%2C%206811CP%2C%20Arnhem%2C%20The%20Netherlands&vehicle=foot&elevation=true&layer=Lyrk">https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=Amsterdamseweg%2C%206816%2C%20Arnhem%2C%20The%20Netherlands&point=Ruiterstraat%2C%206811CP%2C%20Arnhem%2C%20The%20Netherlands&vehicle=foot&elevation=true&layer=Lyrk</a><br>
<br>
The cycling route is 2 KM shorter and is a fine pedestrian route
as well. I guess we need a kind of delta to determine when to
consider the cycling route over the route that prevents cycleways.
I see that this might add complexity to the route generation and
as far as I know is a feature that has not been implemented.<br>
<br>
It could be that my example is not representative due to mapping
errors. Since I'm totally blind it is not easy to survey the map
and check if everything is mapped correctly. If so, I would be
glad to try some other examples.<br>
<br>
Bram<br>
On 16-1-2015 23:41, Peter wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:54B993AA.9020102@gmx.de" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Sorry, took a bit ;). Let me know if
this fixes your problem:<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/303">https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/303</a><br>
<br>
should be live in 2 days.<br>
<br>
Peter<br>
<br>
<br>
On 13.11.2014 18:36, Bram Duvigneau wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:5464EC1D.8030803@bramd.nl" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hello,<br>
<br>
Of course the situation may be different from region to
region, but I can't think of a cycle way here (Netherlands)
that is not allowed for pedestrians. I also see many streets
with separate cycleways where the sidewalk is next to the
cycleway and the sidewalk is not tagged on the main way, nor
on the cycle way. <br>
<br>
In my experience until now planning local pedestrian routes,
the bike profile always gives a better route then the
pedestrian profile.<br>
<br>
Bram<br>
On 13-11-2014 0:56, Peter wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:5463F3C5.509@gmx.de" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html; ">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hmmh, that is a common problem:
it is a cycleway and foot is not explicitely allowed there.
So strictly speaking this is correct according to the
mapping.<br>
<br>
I understand the problem and I also found places where this
was ugly for myself. At the same time there are places where
it is important to keep walking people off this road. What
we could do is allow access but make it AVOID_AT_ALL_COSTS.<br>
<br>
Peter.<br>
<br>
<br>
On 11.11.2014 23:51, D KING wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1415746303.87149.YahooMailNeo@web87904.mail.ir2.yahoo.com"
type="cite">
<div>
<div>We have many shared use paths in our local area, but
these are only available within the current Graphhopper
Maps implementation within the cycling mode. They are
usually useful walking routes, often the only available
footpath links across rivers.<br>
<br>
We have a Sustrans cycle route on the alignment of the
old railway from Bath>Bristol, and also the riverside
towpath, both of which are unavailable for walking
routes within Graphhopper.<br>
<br>
(Correct alignment in cycling) <br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=51.430789%2C-2.475915&point=51.412966%2C-2.455616&point=51.390744%2C-2.422142&point=51.381853%2C-2.390213&point=51.384022%2C-2.381823&point=51.379656%2C-2.367382&point=51.378585%2C-2.363906&point=51.377647%2C-2.35086&point=51.388361%2C-2.347877&point=51.392351%2C-2.339101&point=51.396742%2C-2.316699&point=51.394011%2C-2.313566&vehicle=bike&elevation=true&layer=TF%20Outdoors">https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=51.430789%2C-2.475915&point=51.412966%2C-2.455616&point=51.390744%2C-2.422142&point=51.381853%2C-2.390213&point=51.384022%2C-2.381823&point=51.379656%2C-2.367382&point=51.378585%2C-2.363906&point=51.377647%2C-2.35086&point=51.388361%2C-2.347877&point=51.392351%2C-2.339101&point=51.396742%2C-2.316699&point=51.394011%2C-2.313566&vehicle=bike&elevation=true&layer=TF%20Outdoors</a><br>
<br>
(Incorrectly missing the walking possibilities)<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=51.430789%2C-2.475915&point=51.412966%2C-2.455616&point=51.390744%2C-2.422142&point=51.381853%2C-2.390213&point=51.384022%2C-2.381823&point=51.379656%2C-2.367382&point=51.378585%2C-2.363906&point=51.377647%2C-2.35086&point=51.388361%2C-2.347877&point=51.392351%2C-2.339101&point=51.396742%2C-2.316699&point=51.394011%2C-2.313566&vehicle=foot&elevation=true&layer=TF%20Outdoors">https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=51.430789%2C-2.475915&point=51.412966%2C-2.455616&point=51.390744%2C-2.422142&point=51.381853%2C-2.390213&point=51.384022%2C-2.381823&point=51.379656%2C-2.367382&point=51.378585%2C-2.363906&point=51.377647%2C-2.35086&point=51.388361%2C-2.347877&point=51.392351%2C-2.339101&point=51.396742%2C-2.316699&point=51.394011%2C-2.313566&vehicle=foot&elevation=true&layer=TF%20Outdoors</a><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
GraphHopper mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:GraphHopper@openstreetmap.org">GraphHopper@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>