<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div>I strongly prefer encoded into the URL, to stay consistent with how tiles are currently requested, and make it simple to adapt client viewers.</div><div></div><div><br></div><div>Looks like "tile_translate" in mod_tile.c would be the place to start? Have you forked mod_tile on github?</div><div> </div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;">* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron</span><br></div><div><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; margin-top: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"> <div style="font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div style="font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div dir="ltr"> <font size="2" face="Arial"> <hr size="1"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> Rob Warren
<warren@muninn-project.org><br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> historic@openstreetmap.org <br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Wednesday, February 27, 2013 7:39 AM<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> [Historic] Dating features (was: Introduction & questions)<br> </font> </div> <br>
Richard,<br><br>nice to talk to you again, we previously met at the OSM Hack weekend in Toronto last year.<br><br>There have been some previous discussions on the mailing list about this topic that should probably be added to the wiki. I also have an interest in modelling troop movement, through how to do this would breaking the rails databases is problematic. ...there is also the question of whether we wish to link to 'current' features within OSM proper.<br><br>I'm currently fighting with renderd - I'd like to be able to add date ranges to tile requests so that only items within that time range are rendered on the map. I'm trying to decide between a scheme where the date range is encoded directly into the URL or within a parameter of the URL request. Any preferences?<br><br>best,<br>rhw<br>> Message: 3<br>> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:11:21 -0500<br>> From: Richard Welty <<a ymailto="mailto:rwelty@averillpark.net"
href="mailto:rwelty@averillpark.net">rwelty@averillpark.net</a>><br>> To: <a ymailto="mailto:historic@openstreetmap.org" href="mailto:historic@openstreetmap.org">historic@openstreetmap.org</a><br>> Subject: [Historic] introduction & questions<br>> Message-ID: <<a ymailto="mailto:512D08D8.6010707@averillpark.net" href="mailto:512D08D8.6010707@averillpark.net">512D08D8.6010707@averillpark.net</a>><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br>> <br>> i just joined; Jeff Meyers pointed me at the list after a brief exchange<br>> on talk-us<br>> <br>> apparently some history oriented OSM projects i'm interested in doing<br>> match up pretty<br>> closely with the goals of this project, and the strategy here looks very<br>> much like what i<br>> thought would be necessary.<br>> <br>> i'm (among other things) interested in entering time stamped troop<br>> movements from<br>>
American Civil War battles and campaigns, with the ultimate goal of<br>> producing<br>> customizable animations showing the progress of events.<br>> <br>> having said that, has there been any previous discussion about tagging?<br>> in particular,<br>> things like having a standard tag prefix so that we have a somewhat<br>> independent<br>> namespace, e.g. historic:foo or ohm:foo?<br>> <br>> has there been any previous discussion about tagging historical events<br>> and places in<br>> general?<br>> <br>> thanks,<br>> richard<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Historic mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:Historic@openstreetmap.org" href="mailto:Historic@openstreetmap.org">Historic@openstreetmap.org</a><br>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic<br><br><br> </div> </div> </blockquote></div> </div></body></html>