<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0"><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;"><p>OHM +1<br><br></p>
<p>Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android</p>
</td></tr></table>            <div id="_origMsg_">
                <div style="font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif:font-size:10pt">
                    <br />
                    <div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt">
                        <font size="2" face="Tahoma">
                            <hr size="1">
                            <b>
                                <span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span>
                            </b>
                            Richard Welty <rwelty@averillpark.net>;                            <br>
                            <b>
                                <span style="font-weight:bold:">To:</span>
                            </b>
                             <historic@openstreetmap.org>;                                                                                                     <br>
                            <b>
                                <span style="font-weight:bold:">Subject:</span>
                            </b>
                            Re: [Historic] "HOSM" or "OHM"?                            <br>
                            <b>
                                <span style="font-weight:bold;">Sent:</span>
                            </b>
                            Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:40:49 PM                            <br>
                            </font>
                            <br>
                            <table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0">
                                <tbody>
                                    <tr>
                                        <td valign="top" style="font:inherit;">On 2/28/13 8:21 AM, Owens, Trevor wrote:<BR>> Mostly an avid lurker here, but I figured I'd throw in two cents to say that OHM has a nice ring to it and I think for folks that folks who know OSM would make the connection in their minds (It has the same cadence to it & same first and last letter).<BR>><BR>> Beyond that, OHM would make a lot more sense to folks who aren't particularly familiar with OSM. Given that folks want to go way back in history, it's also worth noting that "street" doesn't have a universal historical connotation. (Thinking here of historians that one would love to have get involved working on early Norse societies or archeologists working with pre-colonial history of the Americas both of whom might be excited about working with historical maps, but might see the word "street" and think it's not really for them). I don't think that's a
 particularly significant issue, but just a short note to mention that the project might seem more inviting to some if it didn't have "Street" in the title.<BR>><BR>i think OHM is fine. i also think we might consider using ohm: as a <BR>prefix for tags so that<BR>there is a unique namespace for the project.<BR><BR>richard<BR><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Historic mailing list<BR><a ymailto="mailto:Historic@openstreetmap.org" href="javascript:return">Historic@openstreetmap.org</a><BR><a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic" target=_blank >http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic</a><BR></td>
                                    </tr>
                                </tbody>
                            </table>
                    </div>
                </div>
            </div>