<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/2/15 2:35 PM, Tim Waters wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAOKL=GzRShXZj2+nnd+9b3XOW35ph_0uJUR3ypBXkhTWM+n+oA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr"> I'm also requesting an <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://overpass.openhistoricalmap.org">overpass.openhistoricalmap.org</a>
subdomain too. There are currently minute replications in the
file system - details in the wiki.
<div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
...<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAOKL=GzRShXZj2+nnd+9b3XOW35ph_0uJUR3ypBXkhTWM+n+oA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>At present the project is tiny, so we can stuff things on
the one box, since we also serve tiles and will serve the
planet from it. This will of course change, in time as the
project grows. So at present, in my mind, there's no reason
why we shouldn't serve Overpass from the OHM box.</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
this is roughly what i expected, and the separate domain name is
what i<br>
would have recommended as it will facilitate easy migration to a
separate<br>
server when the time comes.<br>
<br>
as for development, my priority is a production application of
overpass<br>
as it is, so i concur with you on that issue. as soon as it appears,
i plan<br>
to start using it for live applications as overpass already provides
everything<br>
i want right now.<br>
<br>
richard<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rwelty@averillpark.net">rwelty@averillpark.net</a>
Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting
OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux
Java - Web Applications - Search</pre>
</body>
</html>