<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/22/15 11:53 AM, Susanna Ånäs
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABQ1c1zsEBS9au9DTNe6RwpsLNwSJQxWnQYSRxnLPyx3GOopJQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">I will submit a talk about the recent Wiki Loves
Maps hackathon and the hacks related to historical mapping. For
your information, we intend to continue developing at least 3
different hacks started in the context of the hackathon:
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
this sounds like 4 strong proposals. when the program committee
convenes<br>
we'll see what's what, but this could easily make up an OHM oriented
session.<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABQ1c1zsEBS9au9DTNe6RwpsLNwSJQxWnQYSRxnLPyx3GOopJQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite"><br>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<ul>
<li><b>Source/provenance stuff</b>. Most data added to
OHM will require a fair degree of research & is
not standardly verifiable a la OSM, plus use by
digital humanities scholars pretty much mandates a
high degree of documentation of the data. I have
therefore been thinking a bit about how one might
better support this need. <br>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
i had been thinking on this the other day, and was planning to start
writing<br>
something about it in my copious spare time.<br>
<br>
richard<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rwelty@averillpark.net">rwelty@averillpark.net</a>
Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting
OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux
Java - Web Applications - Search</pre>
</body>
</html>