<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=us-ascii" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.19019"></HEAD>
<BODY style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 10px"><LINK
rel=stylesheet type=text/css
href="http://www.clubmontagnecanadien.qc.ca/css/style_cmc_courriel.css">
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana><FONT size=2></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana><FONT color=#0000ff size=2>Below are two subjects that
need completion in Haiti. </FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff size=2 face=Verdana></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana><FONT color=#0000ff size=2>Haiti populated places is
partly completed and needs some revision; <FONT face=Verdana><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2>many villages are not integrated in the
database.</FONT></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I have compared the OSM database with OCHA list of populated
places; this reconciliation with OCHA list shows </DIV>
<UL>
<LI>2553 localities in both OSM and OCHA</LI>
<LI>512 in OSM only (in general, either regional areas with uppercase
characters in TLM-50, valleys, bays, etc.)</LI>
<LI>4337 localities in OCHA list only; how confident we can be with these 4337
OCHA coordinates and names of localities? </LI>
<LI>Where to address specific questions / problems like two adjacent
Descarreaux localities near Desdunes? </LI></UL>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff>Sections communales boundaries have to revise
to match OCHA database. In that respect, is OCHA v-1-4 the most recent
version?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>A comparison with OCHA v-1-4 shows many discrepancies.</DIV><FONT
face=Verdana>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV align=left><FONT size=2>
<HR style="WIDTH: 122px; HEIGHT: 2px" SIZE=2>
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#c0c0c0><FONT color=#000080 size=2><EM><SPAN>Pierre
Béland</SPAN></EM></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#c0c0c0><FONT color=#000080
size=2><EM></EM></FONT></FONT> </DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>