<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hello Sérgio,<br>
      <br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:SNT153-W2630D02A052363582BEB8C904C0@phx.gbl"
      type="cite">
      <style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style>
      <div dir="ltr"><br>
        <div><span style="font-size: 12pt;">It's not hard to find those
            devasted areas and buildings </span><span style="font-size:
            12pt;">by comparing </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">the
            images in OSM with </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">recent
            publicly released satellite images. </span><span
            style="font-size: 12pt;">Guess it would be a great help for
            humanitarian efforts related to destruction and population
            displaced (I think also on tasks of Gaza, tsunamis,
            earthquakes and similars situations).</span></div>
        <div><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br>
          </span></div>
        <div>In what Kevin Bullock said, is it confirmed that such
          satellite images of devastation from Digital Globe released on
          newspapers, like by Amnesty (<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://adam.amnesty.org/asset-bank/action/search?attribute_603=Nigeria+Satellite+Images+January+2015"
            target="_blank">https://adam.amnesty.org/asset-bank/action/search?attribute_603=Nigeria+Satellite+Images+January+2015</a>),
          are free to use to map on OSM by "manual" comparision?</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    if you look at the images provided in the link from your mail and
    select "View Details" then you can read the agreement that these
    images were specifically licensed to amnesty international for their
    press release. This means that we cannot use them. <br>
    <br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:SNT153-W2630D02A052363582BEB8C904C0@phx.gbl"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>By the way, to represent reality and help the efforts of
          identification by people using the map, what about if OSM
          renderize buildings tagged "demolished=yes" to represent
          better that they actualy are demolished, perhaps with only
          outline, or dotted, not shaded? (Anyway, remarking they are
          different from standing buldings).  </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    I recall that such tagging schemes were applied for the typhoon
    mapping in the Philippines, see e.g. the instructions of  <a
      href="http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/392">http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/392</a>,
    I am not sure if the damage tag has been approved as a general
    tagging style though.<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
      <i>Michael<br>
        <small>(osm:michael63)</small>
      </i></div>
  </body>
</html>