<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hi Mike, and David,<br>
<br>
In JOSM, if I right-click on the Bing imagery near the location
given by David, and choose "Display tile information", it shows
that capture date was: 4/6/2011.<br>
<br>
So, if we trust the metadata, Bing imagery is older than the date
mentioned for WorldView-2. The two small buildings described by
David may have been destroyed in the meantime.<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
Jean-Guilhem<br>
<br>
<br>
Le 20/02/2016 15:24, Mike Thompson a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CALJoUkv5bEznEEUVduouztLhjEbvVj=0v4kiO_Bp7FtM-Rbz2g@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">John,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I agree the most recent imagery should be used, but how do
we know the collection date for the Bing imagery?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Mike</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 7:14 AM, john
whelan <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:jwhelan0112@gmail.com" target="_blank">jwhelan0112@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small">I
imagine the most recent imagery should be used. Some
imagery is quite old so more buildings may have been
built.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small">Cheerio
John<br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 20 February 2016 at 09:00,
David Groom <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:reviews@pacific-rim.net"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:reviews@pacific-rim.net">reviews@pacific-rim.net</a></a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">OSM
Tasking manaager #1129 imagery priority<br>
<br>
When there is a difference between detailed Bing
imagery and the WorldView-2, 07 Nov 2014;
DigitalGlobe, NextView imagery which should take
precedence?<br>
<br>
An example can be seen to the south west of the
sports pitch here <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/10.13336/124.85114"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/10.13336/124.85114</a><br>
<br>
There are two small buildings north of the DepEd
building on Bing, not seen on Worldview<br>
<br>
There is a small group of trees to the immediate
west of The DedEd building on Bing, but buildings
can be seen here in Worldview<br>
<br>
This is a minor, but easy to appreciate example.
I have also come across quite a few buildings
traced from Bing (and still visible on the Bing
imagery), but there is no evidence of these on
Wordview imagery<br>
<br>
David<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
"On ne m’ôtera pas de l’idée que, pendant la dernière guerre
mondiale, de nombreux juifs ont eu une attitude carrément hostile
à l’égard du régime nazi." Pierre Desproges<br>
"I won't be deprived of the idea that, during the last world war,
many Jews had a downright hostile attitude toward the Nazi
regime."</div>
</body>
</html>