<html><head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head><body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">Perhaps another question
to ask then is is it too complex for new mappers to use when mapping
buildings?<br>
<br>
If we can accept odd shaped buildings that aren't quite the right size
then fine it is the right tool for the job, but if we want fairly
accurate building sizes and square corners on squared buildings so
population estimates can be made then it appears from the results we see
that it requires more training and a higher standard of mapping than
new mappers are capable of with the current levels of training. In
other words it doesn't matter how good a tool it is or what it is
capable of if the new mappers don't understand how to use it.<br>
<br>
And we still haven't really come to a conclusion about whether having
squared buildings matters.<br>
<br>
Cheerio John<br>
<br>
<span>Paul Norman wrote:</span><br>
<blockquote cite="mid:571E7C4A.1010105@mac.com" type="cite">It's been
stated a few times but since there's still confusion: iD has a
button to square features. It has had this feature since before it was
released.
<br>
<br>
We need to stop wrongly blaming iD, as it's not productive at figuring
out what to change, and where.
</blockquote>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<div>Sent from <a
href="https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach"><span
style="color: rgb(51, 102, 153);">Postbox</span></a></div></div>
</body></html>