<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hello Kevin,<br>
      <br>
      the wiki is always a good resource. There are project pages for
      many countries which contain tagging guidelines inluding a
      translation from official classification to OSM classification,
      e.g.:<br>
      <br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_India">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_India</a>  => 
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India:Tags/Highway">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India:Tags/Highway</a><br>
      <br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_South_Africa">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_South_Africa</a> 
      => 
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/South_African_Tagging_Guidelines">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/South_African_Tagging_Guidelines</a><br>
      <br>
      For many countries covered by HOT projects such pages do not exist
      which led to the creation of a few guidelines by HOT already
      mentioned in this thread:<br>
      <br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa</a><br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines</a><br>
      <br>
      Any modifications should best be discussed (and finally
      documented) on these pages.<br>
      <br>
       <br>
      <div class="moz-signature"><i>Michael<br>
          <small>(osm:michael63)<br>
            Chairman of the HOT Training Working Group</small>
        </i></div>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <font color="#666666">Kevin McPherson via HOT, 07.04.19 18:59:</font><br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:656422136.18060446.1554656355549@mail.yahoo.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div class="ydp5be2f6dyahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family:bookman
        old style, new york, times, serif;font-size:16px;">
        <div>Dear all, I am new to this HOT interface on OSM, but joined
          last week, and interested in road classification in OSM. This
          is my first posting, and first time I have engaged with anyone
          on OSM, so am still getting up to speed.<br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>"Road Classification" is an important topic for roads
          agencies, it helps define the funding and prioritisation for
          development and maintenance of the road network in a country.</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>With regards to OSM, one issue is that the <highway>
          tag in OSM is never quite the same as the official definition
          of the country. For example, the highway tag:<br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway"
            rel="nofollow" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway</a></div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>uses "Motorway", "Trunk", "Primary", "Secondary" etc. while
          a national roads agency might use other terminology such as
          "Main", "District", "Local" etc. <br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>What this means is that the road network classification in
          OSM is never quite the same as that used by the Roads Agency,
          and there are discrepancies between the "official" data of the
          roads agency, and the OSM definition. This causes confusion to
          anyone who wants accurate mapping.<br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>As part of my work, I am trying to encourage Roads Agencies
          to review OSM mapping, to compare with their official
          definitions, and to update OSM based on their own records.
          However, the differences in the classification terminologies
          are a barrier to this. Every country potentially has a
          different classification system. We have been discussing
          internally that an extra "layer" on top of OSM might be a way
          forward, but that is an overhead and requires extra cost and
          administration.</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Would be grateful for anyone's views on this.</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Regards, Kevin McPherson<br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div id="ydpf8af174yahoo_quoted_4784153384"
        class="ydpf8af174yahoo_quoted">
        <div style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial,
          sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#26282a;">
          <div> On Saturday, April 6, 2019, 3:34:19 PM GMT+1, Ralf
            Bernhardt <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:raabee@gmx.de"><raabee@gmx.de></a> wrote: </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>
            <div id="ydpf8af174yiv6308088458">
              <div>
                <p>My point this time is not the classification of a few
                  roads. What I learn from this, is that our data is
                  processed and reviewed again. If a mapping error is
                  detected by local staff, it will most likely only be
                  reported to their own mapping department. It will also
                  only be fixed locally. We as mappers or validators
                  will never learn from this process. All errors will
                  remain in the OSM Database. That might be
                  understandable in an emergency situation like now. 
                  But without direct feedback from map users we will
                  never improve. We should also demand that more local
                  knowledge will be shared with OSM. A simple thank you
                  is not enough.</p>
                <p>Ralf<br clear="none">
                </p>
                <div class="ydpf8af174yiv6308088458yqt1676662925"
                  id="ydpf8af174yiv6308088458yqt17987">
                  <div class="ydpf8af174yiv6308088458moz-cite-prefix">On
                    06.04.19 13:29, John Whelan wrote:<br clear="none">
                  </div>
                  <blockquote type="cite"> </blockquote>
                </div>
              </div>
              <div class="ydpf8af174yiv6308088458yqt1676662925"
                id="ydpf8af174yiv6308088458yqt96572">
                <div>
                  <div style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Verdana;">There
                    is another wiki guide <br clear="none">
                    <br clear="none">
                    <a shape="rect"
                      href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa"
                      rel="nofollow" target="_blank"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa</a><br
                      clear="none">
                    <br clear="none">
                    both get updated from time to time.  As a general
                    rule of thumb I tag highways between settlements as
                    unclassified not track, I leave it to the local
                    mappers to say if it is a higher classification. 
                    Occasionally I'll tag as high as tertiary. Normally
                    I leave the tags alone but have been known to retag
                    motorways between two small settlements as
                    unclassified.<br clear="none">
                    <br clear="none">
                    I think step one is to get something mapped.  Step
                    two is correct it and with lots of new mappers with
                    different ideas we'll always see some problems.<br
                      clear="none">
                    <br clear="none">
                    Cheerio John <br clear="none">
                    <br clear="none">
                    <span>Frans Schutz wrote on 2019-04-06 6:27 AM:</span><br
                      clear="none">
                    <blockquote type="cite">Hello Ralf <br clear="none">
                      <br clear="none">
                      you pinpoint to a situation which is not always
                      clear. <br clear="none">
                      First of all. we ty to keep ourselves to the East
                      African Highway tagging wiki <br clear="none">
                      <a shape="rect"
                        class="ydpf8af174yiv6308088458moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines"
                        rel="nofollow" target="_blank"
                        moz-do-not-send="true">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines</a>
                      <br clear="none">
                      <br clear="none">
                      Different mappers judge different how to tag a
                      highway. Out of my own experience lots of mappers
                      (and validators) struggle with how to tag a
                      highway.  Looking to the importance, the routing,
                      and the width of the highway, which is hard to
                      measure from a satellite image, we have to decide.
                      A big number of new mappers are joining us and
                      have different ideas (nor no idea at all) how to
                      tag a highway. I've seen taggings as secondary
                      highway as a connection to 2 hamlets and so on. So
                      we try to tag as good as possible, but often it is
                      a (calculated)guess which tag is relevant. Take
                      also in account that there is a huge time pressure
                      on these disaster mapping projects, so sometimes
                      you accept the tagging as they were made. When
                      there is no time pressure you can take a look to
                      each highway and decide. <br clear="none">
                      I hope you get an understanding how we have to
                      deal with this subject. <br clear="none">
                      Best regards <br clear="none">
                      Frans Schutz <br clear="none">
                      Validator <br clear="none">
                      <br clear="none">
                      <br clear="none">
                      <br clear="none">
                      Op 5-4-2019 om 20:10 schreef Ralf Bernhardt: <br
                        clear="none">
                      <blockquote type="cite">Interesting when compared
                        to the openstreetmap data. <br clear="none">
                        <br clear="none">
                        There are many POIs I would like to see on
                        Openstreetmap too, also <br clear="none">
                        boundarys and place names. <br clear="none">
                        <br clear="none">
                        I also noticed a different tagging scheme: Car,
                        Moto and Foot. I would <br clear="none">
                        guess that Roads not passable for a car but by
                        foot and moto should be <br clear="none">
                        highway=path in OSM. <br clear="none">
                        <br clear="none">
                        But most of them are still tagged as
                        unclassified or residential. Is <br
                          clear="none">
                        there a reason for that or will you change them
                        later? <br clear="none">
                        <br clear="none">
                        _______________________________________________
                        <br clear="none">
                        HOT mailing list <br clear="none">
                        <a shape="rect"
                          class="ydpf8af174yiv6308088458moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
                          href="mailto:HOT@openstreetmap.org"
                          rel="nofollow" target="_blank"
                          moz-do-not-send="true">HOT@openstreetmap.org</a>
                        <br clear="none">
                        <a shape="rect"
                          class="ydpf8af174yiv6308088458moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot" rel="nofollow"
                          target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot</a>
                        <br clear="none">
                      </blockquote>
                      <br clear="none">
                    </blockquote>
                    <br clear="none">
                    <div class="ydpf8af174yiv6308088458moz-signature">--
                      <br clear="none">
                      <div>Sent from <a shape="rect"
href="https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach"
                          rel="nofollow" target="_blank"
                          moz-do-not-send="true"><span
                            style="color:rgb(0, 157, 247);">Postbox</span></a></div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
            <div class="ydpf8af174yqt1676662925" id="ydpf8af174yqt85449">_______________________________________________<br
                clear="none">
              HOT mailing list<br clear="none">
              <a shape="rect" href="mailto:HOT@openstreetmap.org"
                rel="nofollow" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">HOT@openstreetmap.org</a><br
                clear="none">
              <a shape="rect"
                href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot"
                rel="nofollow" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot</a><br
                clear="none">
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:HOT@openstreetmap.org">HOT@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>