<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><small>Il 23/11/2012 18:41, Martin
Koppenhoefer ha scritto:<br>
</small></div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTC2CFA+y2utN5szTZ3q7hGQ6vVc0YrMoZAmg_To6stAng@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite"><small>For cc0 the case should be clear, and also
cc-by would AFAIK comply
with our current terms (as long as you cite them correctly,
rumours go
that a mention in the wiki would be sufficient). A problem might
be if
the active contributors decided in the future to move to an even
more
open license (e.g. cc0) in which case the cc-by data would not
comply
any more to the license and would have to be removed (probably
together with what has been built upon). The more data with
cc-by we
import, the less free we are to decide to go PD / cc0.
</small></blockquote>
<small><br>
Hello Martin,<br>
<br>
In any case we've got plenty of CC-BY data due to current, so I
think it's not a bigger problem to add more.<br>
<br>
</small>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTC2CFA+y2utN5szTZ3q7hGQ6vVc0YrMoZAmg_To6stAng@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite"><small>
So I wouldn't consider this an automated import, maybe as long
as you
survey everything nor even an import at all (you are not copying
but
retracing by hand = there is also a kind of verification /
judgement).
cheers,
Martin</small></blockquote>
<small><br>
Yes, there are also some data available as shp files (under CC0)
we can import directly without redrawing, but most of them are
available only on WMS servers<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Maurizio</small><br>
</body>
</html>