<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Christoph Hormann <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:chris_hormann@gmx.de" target="_blank">chris_hormann@gmx.de</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">On Friday 18 July 2014, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > The OpenStreetMap community<br>
> > has been trying to make a perfect import for years. It hasn't<br>
> > happened yet.m<br>
><br>
> If I recall right, the Antarctica import didn't cause any complaints<br>
> whatsoever - admittedly the particular setting (no residents, few<br>
> existing data which was also mostly imported and not so many eyes on<br>
> the region) made this a little easier than the typical import ;-)<br>
<br>
</div>Indeed - this is certainly not an example to use as a reference for<br>
imports elsewhere.<br>
<br>
Still the fact that there have been no complaints does not mean there is<br>
nothing that could be complained about. Especially since about 2/3 of<br>
the data does not show up in the standard map at the moment so most<br>
people are not even aware that this data exists.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>We're drifting off topic here, everyone. This is a discussion about the Washington, DC buildings Import and we don't need to bring in the topic of if imports are good or not.</div>
<div><br></div><div>-Your friendly imports@ moderator</div></div></div></div>