<div dir="ltr">It's now possible to evaluate these issues.<div><br><div>The import has moved into the synchronization phase. A few dozen imported locations have been located on the ground by mappers, and shuffled to their exact position.</div><div><br>The final choice on fuzzy match has been a simple 90 meter proximity search. So far all stations searched for have been found.</div><div><br></div><div>The biggest problem came from out of the blue: there have been a dozen or so unique mappers using the tag to mark a bicycle shop,<br></div><div>or in one case "a guy who fixes bicycles". In retrospect the tag name <b>bicycle_tool_stand </b>or<b> bike_self_repair_tools</b> might have been less confusing.</div><div> </div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Paul Norman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:penorman@mac.com" target="_blank">penorman@mac.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><span class="">
On 1/22/2015 2:27 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div lang="x-unicode">
<div dir="ltr">For your comment:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Dero_Bike_Repair" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Dero_Bike_Repair</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
This is an interesting proposal<br>
<br>
<b>Legal</b><br>
As ODbL, the data is obviously compatible and compatible with the
contributor terms. It would be good to get something on the record
from Dero that the license is ODbL, either an email or something
public would work.<br>
<br>
<b>Tagging</b><br>
The tagging looks okay, but it's a bit of an interesting case -
bicycle repair stations are clearly of interest to mappers, but for
various reasons there aren't many tagged.<br>
<br>
Dero seems to use "Dero" for their branding instead of "dero", so
brand=Dero would probably be better. I would add details about the
changeset tagging you're proposing on using to your proposal.<br>
<br>
<b>Data Quality<br>
</b>There are some duplicate stations in the data - downtown
Vancouver has an example of two at the exact same location with
different operators. Outside Seattle at Bellevue College is another
example which is possibly duplicates.<br>
<br>
<b>Fuzzy Matching<br>
</b>It's hard to comment on this. What ever matching is used will
undoubtedly need tweaking, both after importing reveals problems and
as bike repair stations become more common, both as street
furniture, in Dero's database, and in the OSM database.<br>
<br>
How will it be handled if a station is imported, then a subsequent
import run finds it has been deleted?<br>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Imports mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Imports@openstreetmap.org">Imports@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>