<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Mike Henson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mikehenson@hotmail.com" target="_blank">mikehenson@hotmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>The provider did not give/have a tag building=house. This is a manual building by building review.</div><div>Here is an example of a change set with a couple dozen houses and address POIs. </div><div><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46384567" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/<wbr>changeset/46384567</a></div></blockquote></div><br>Mike,</div><div class="gmail_extra">The import test looks good. Not sure you need to keep the tags STTYPE and STNAME. There is a JOSM Map Paint Style, Address Tag Validator, that will help validate the street name on either a node or building polygon. It gives the street and addr node/polygon a color based on the street name. If you have a node with a different color than the street, it gives you a clue that something might be wrong. </div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Clifford<br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>@osm_seattle<br></div><div><a href="http://osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us" target="_blank">osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us</a></div><div>OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch</div></div></div>
</div></div>