<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
On 11/1/2017 11:41 AM, Tobias Knerr wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:e3b758b6-7465-547b-8062-e753cd68c0d0@tobias-knerr.de">
<pre wrap="">On 01.11.2017 18:56, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">
<pre wrap="">What you says applies to every import not PD, CC0 or PDDL licensed, as
stated here:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility" moz-do-not-send="true">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">In addition to those, there's also the possibility of an explicit
permission for OSM, as I mentioned in my first mail. I hope someone with
more legal knowledge than myself can properly answer Vincent's question
about the wording of that permission.
But yes, this issue is not limited to ODbL.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">
<pre wrap="">I can't see why Vincent's proposed import is different from other
imports we already did in the past (ODbL, CC-BY or OGL licensed).
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">There's nothing special about Vincent's proposed import from this legal
point of view. In my opinion, we should indeed refrain from importing
data under such licenses as a general rule.
That such imports have been performed in the past is true. At least in
my case, however, the reason why I didn't raise similar objections back
then is simply that I didn't pay close enough attention.</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Third-party ODbL-licensed data can be imported:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_and_Legal_FAQ#Can_third-party_ODbL-licensed_data_be_imported.3F">https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_and_Legal_FAQ#Can_third-party_ODbL-licensed_data_be_imported.3F</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>