<div dir="ltr">Hi Andrea,<div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">There is still an historic=monument.</span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Sorry, done. </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">If I'm not mistaken, the proposal is to map an "oratorio" in the following way:</span><br style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial"><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">amenity=community_centre<br></span><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">community_centre=parish_hall<br></span><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">denomination=catholic<br></span><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">religion=christian<span> </span></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Ok I fixed</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">The problem is that without a tagging plan we have to scan for features in your OSM file to see if they are mapped correctly :-/</span>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I tried to make it clearer, p<span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">lease review them</span>.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>
<blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class="gmail_quote">Why did you avoid "not residential" buildings?</blockquote><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class="gmail_quote">For example, the following building is still not correctly mapped (and it is not the only one):<br><a href="https://postimg.org/image/p3b4wmsgz/" style="color:rgb(17,85,204)" target="_blank">https://postimg.org/image/p3b4<wbr>wmsgz/</a></blockquote><div><br></div><div>yes but that was a problematic one: if I creat two building parts and a building feature that contains them, josm validator marks them as an error. (perhaps for the particular shape). I solved by erasing the lower part that surrounded the main building.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">(and it is not the only one)</span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I checked again, I hope it's better now </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">Anyway it seems the OSM file is in much better shape. Let's hope to finish this review soon :-)</span></blockquote><div></div>
<br></div><div>thanks for your patience ;)</div><div><br></div><div>bye</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2018-02-16 18:16 GMT+01:00 Andrea Musuruane <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:musuruan@gmail.com" target="_blank">musuruan@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hi Giorgio,<br><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 6:13 PM, Giorgio Limonta <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:giorgio.limonta80@gmail.com" target="_blank">giorgio.limonta80@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span class="m_-7615103685599139064gmail-">You wrongly tagged history=memorial features as historic=monument.<br><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmonument" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org<wbr>/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmonument</a><br></span></blockquote></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>There is still an historic=monument.<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span class="m_-7615103685599139064gmail-">Please look at this recent thread on the talk-it ML about correctly tagging an "oratorio" (e.g. the youth centre, not the church):<br><a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2018-February/062020.html" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.or<wbr>g/pipermail/talk-it/2018-Febru<wbr>ary/062020.html</a><br></span><span class="m_-7615103685599139064gmail-">OK but I don't think bell towers are places of worship. Other opinions are welcome.</span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Done thanks</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>If I'm not mistaken, the proposal is to map an "oratorio" in the following way:<br><br>
amenity=community_centre<br>
community_centre=parish_hall<br>
denomination=catholic<br>
religion=christian
<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><span class="m_-7615103685599139064gmail-"><div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">What is missing in your proposal is a good tagging plan (i.e. what tags will be places on different features). Right now I have to look for features and see if they are tagged correctly.<br>An (old) example is the following:<br><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sardegna/Import/Edificato#Tagging" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org<wbr>/wiki/Sardegna/Import/Edificat<wbr>o#Tagging</a></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>Yes my tagging plan it's very simple because the import information are poor. But I will improve the information after the import with a "classic" mapping approach ;)</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The problem is that without a tagging plan we have to scan for features in your OSM file to see if they are mapped correctly :-/<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">About 3D buildings<span class="m_-7615103685599139064gmail-"><br>There should be only one building tag on the outline. But you have two building=* and there isn't one on the building outline.<br>Tags relevant for the complete building should be only on the building outline (e.g. amenity=place_of_worship + religion=* + denomination=* + name=*). <br>If you want to specify different height and roof on the various parts, you must place a building:part tag on each of them.<br>Thus 2D renderers will ignore building:part tags but they will show the overall building.</span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>You right, I (think) understand that and I fixed the "not residential" buildings</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Why did you avoid "not residential" buildings?<br><br></div><div>For example, the following building is still not correctly mapped (and it is not the only one):<br><a href="https://postimg.org/image/p3b4wmsgz/" target="_blank">https://postimg.org/image/<wbr>p3b4wmsgz/</a><br><br></div><div>It should have two building:part tags one for each different section of the house (now it only has one).<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><span class="m_-7615103685599139064gmail-"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">It is wrong to have two POI's - one as a building and one as a node. <br>Anyway, I haven't understood how and when you will handle these duplicate features.<br>BTW, what is wrong with the name "Teatro Olimpico"? You could tag the feature with name="Teatro all'Antica" ("all'Antica" and not "All'Antica") and alt_name=""Teatro Olimpico" (<a href="https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teatro_all'Antica" target="_blank">https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki<wbr>/Teatro_all'Antica</a>).</blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>Yes, done.</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>You current OSM file has one duplicate node. You can find it with JOSM validator.<br><br></div><div>Anyway it seems the OSM file is in much better shape. Let's hope to finish this review soon :-)<br></div><div><br></div><div>Bye,<br><br></div><div>Andrea<br> <br></div></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>