<html><head></head><body>Missouri's Freedom of Information Act, Missouri Code 610 (<a href="http://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=610.010&bid=30414&hl=)">http://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=610.010&bid=30414&hl=)</a> defines Public Record as "any record, whether written or electronically stored, retained by or of any public governmental body including any report, survey, memorandum, or other document or study prepared for the public governmental body by a consultant or other professional service paid for in whole or in part by public funds, including records created or maintained by private contractors under an agreement with a public governmental body or on behalf of a public governmental body."<br>
<br>
The record of physical addresses is maintained by the County Assessor.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On July 24, 2018 12:00:49 PM UTC, imports-request@openstreetmap.org wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">Send Imports mailing list submissions to<br> imports@openstreetmap.org<br><br>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports<br>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br> imports-request@openstreetmap.org<br><br>You can reach the person managing the list at<br> imports-owner@openstreetmap.org<br><br>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>than "Re: Contents of Imports digest..."<br><br><br>Today's Topics:<br><br> 1. Re: South KC address import (Pavel Machek)<br> 2. Re: South KC address import (Brian May)<br><br><br><hr><br><br>Message: 1<br>Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:51:15 +0200<br>From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz><br>To: Michael Reichert <osm-ml@michreichert.de><br>Cc: imports@openstreetmap.org, teslas_moustache<br> <teslas_moustache@riseup.net><br>Subject: Re: [Imports] South KC address import<br>Message-ID: <20180723145115.GA26315@amd><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>Hi!<br><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;"> RESERVATION OF RIGHTS<br> <br> The City reserves the right to discontinue availability of content<br> on this website at any time and for any reason. The City reserves the<br> right to claim or seek to protect any patent, copyright, trademark, or<br> other intellectual property rights in any of the information, images,<br> software, or processes displayed or used at this website. These Terms of<br> Use do not grant anyone any title or right to any patent, copyright,<br> trademark or other intellectual property rights that the City may have<br> in any of the information, images, software, or processes displayed or<br> used at this website.<br></blockquote> <br> This term is vague. That's why I think that it is incompatible. Data to<br> be added to OSM must not have revokeable licenses (except violation of<br> the license).<br></blockquote><br>What exactly do you find problematic?<br><br>City reserves right to shut down their website... which is not a<br>problem.<br><br> Pavel<br></pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body></html>