<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hi Pierre - that’s pretty awesome! <div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I verified the data came like that from the source, which is kind of a bummer. I ran some processes on the layer to straighten the angles out, and it appears to have helped, </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">The full and sample OSM files on GitHub have been updated.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thx</div><div class="">-Jonah<br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jun 19, 2019, at 12:58 PM, Pierre Béland <<a href="mailto:pierzenh@yahoo.fr" class="">pierzenh@yahoo.fr</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class=""><div class="ydp6ace1840yahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><div class=""><div class="">Hi Jonah</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I did analysis of your OSM source file as of 2019-06-12 and detected some 15,500 buildings that deviate significantly from square angles buildings. It does not mean that they do not correspond to what is observed on imagery. But with a ratio of 32% of buildings with irregular angles, it would be good to look at these and see if they should be revised.<br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">See Geojson visualisation on Github <a href="https://github.com/opendatalabrdc/OQ_Analysis/blob/master/Geojson_Visualisation_Building_Polygons_with_Irregular_Geometry.md#2019-06-12-city-of-portsmouth-virginia-building-footprints--addresses" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" class="">https://github.com/opendatalabrdc/OQ_Analysis/blob/master/Geojson_Visualisation_Building_Polygons_with_Irregular_Geometry.md#2019-06-12-city-of-portsmouth-virginia-building-footprints--addresses</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I only answer to the import list, since I dont susbcribe to the other lists plus avoid cross-posting . <br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="ydp6ace1840signature"><span style="font-style:italic;color:rgb(0, 0, 191);font-weight:bold;" class=""> <br class=""><font face="garamond, new york, times, serif" class="">Pierre </font><br class=""></span></div></div>
<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div>
</div><div id="ydp2a2c89e1yahoo_quoted_1544953389" class="ydp2a2c89e1yahoo_quoted">
<div style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#26282a;" class="">
<div class="">
Le samedi 15 juin 2019 18 h 28 min 08 s UTC−4, Jonah Adkins <<a href="mailto:jonahadkins@gmail.com" class="">jonahadkins@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :
</div>
<div class=""><br class=""></div>
<div class=""><br class=""></div>
<div class=""><div id="ydp2a2c89e1yiv9970516239" class=""><div class="">Hi Pierre, Thanks for taking a look.<div class="ydp2a2c89e1yiv9970516239"><br class="ydp2a2c89e1yiv9970516239" clear="none"></div><div class="ydp2a2c89e1yiv9970516239">The source data for this import is not AI derived - the state GIS office (VGIN) collects datasets from each city/county in Virginia, then processes them into a statewide dataset that is released (with a OSM compatible license) on a quarterly basis.</div><div class="ydp2a2c89e1yiv9970516239"><br class="ydp2a2c89e1yiv9970516239" clear="none"></div><div class="ydp2a2c89e1yiv9970516239">Was there a particular area in the full or sample OSM files that looked bad?</div><div class="ydp2a2c89e1yiv9970516239"><br class="ydp2a2c89e1yiv9970516239" clear="none"></div><div class="ydp2a2c89e1yiv9970516239">Thx</div><div class="ydp2a2c89e1yiv9970516239">-Jonah</div></div></div></div>
</div>
</div></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>