<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Mar 21, 2020, 09:20 by jgc@arkemie.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div class=""><div> A sentence from the scanned original official authorization letter
explicitly states:<br></div><div> « Therefore, the information can be integrated into OpenStreetMap
cartography […] » <br></div></div></blockquote><div>First they mentioned terms making data ineligible for import into OSM and then<br></div><div>had "information can be integrated into OpenStreetMap
cartography".<br></div><div><br></div><div>It was self-contradictory.<br></div><div><br></div><div>As I understand, it was relicensed to CC0 and problem was removed.<br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div class=""><div> I also take this opportunity to remind that even virtual (on-line)
« endangering of other people », whether negligent or deliberate,
(using wording from French Code Pénal — assuming equivalent
notions also exist in other legislations) is liable to legal
action.<br></div></div></blockquote><div>Yes, but data with for example "can not be used for evil purposes" copyright is not eligible for import <br></div><div>into OSM, due to an incompatible license.<br></div> </body>
</html>