<div dir="ltr">Hi Mateusz, thanks for the feedback! I answer you question by question.<br><br>1) Those areas require a previous conflate, yes. I've done so using JOSM and JOSM/conflation add-on for most of the areas. I indicate "yes, merged" in wiki tables to note if they’re conflated and are ready to upload. I have to edit some areas yet but when necessary I’ll use conflation too. <br><br>2) About the data of accuracy/positioning in relation to OSM data. When working with IET data (shapefiles), I did a double checkout: compare imports with <a href="http://mapas.xunta.gal/visores/basico/">mapas.xunta.gal/visores/basico/ </a>(government official map viewer) and the official documents that parliament passed by to declare natural protected areas (In our case those are published in "Diario Oficial de Galicia – DOG", that contain their maps). I saw no problem about protected areas' position: they fall in their provinces, councils, include or not some villages and so on. In fact, there’s some of them already mapped in osm that have some pitfalls. This import would correct those mistakes. <br><br>3) With "their limits and area must not be modified or simplified in any way." I mean that during the import process we will not modify what official data says. And furthermore, I think that any posterior modification of a protected area (ie. reduction) should be avoided or at least being debated why it needs being done. Protected areas means that some activities are forbidden or limited by law, so I think its precision is key for osm users. But that's out of the import process, of course.<br><br>About the detail too, yes, in some cases source data has too much detail. But a random reduction of it can mean including or not e.g. a small village or even a protected tree from a natural park. That’s why I think that we need to avoid data reduction here.<br><br>About source date, that date is the latest release date for that IET’s data package. We could indicate the present date, tell me what’s better. Anyway, Galician natural protected areas haven’t been modified since then (no new one, and no area modifications). So, yes, this data is too much useful :)<br><br>Hope have answered every question, go on telling me.<br><br>Miguel</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">O sáb., 14 de nov. de 2020 ás 08:00, Mateusz Konieczny (<<a href="mailto:matkoniecz@tutanota.com">matkoniecz@tutanota.com</a>>) escribiu:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div>I just noticed<br></div><div><br></div><div>"source:date=2011-05-10 (Which is the date of creation of that dataset. It can be obtained opening the html description file.)"<br></div><div><br></div><div>Are you sure that importing 9 year old dataset is useful?<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Nov 13, 2020, 20:52 by <a href="mailto:mgl.branco@gmail.com" target="_blank">mgl.branco@gmail.com</a>:<br></div><blockquote style="border-left:1px solid rgb(147,163,184);padding-left:10px;margin-left:5px"><div dir="ltr"><div><span></span><br></div><p style="margin-bottom:0cm;line-height:100%;background:transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%">Hi everybody,<br></p><p style="margin-bottom:0cm;line-height:100%;background:transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%">This year we had
received the Galician government (Spain) approval to use their data
hosted at mapas.xunta.gal (See #1).<br></p><p style="margin-bottom:0cm;line-height:100%;background:transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%">One set of data they
have are natural protected areas of Galicia. We are interested in
importing them. I’ve written a project for doing so (See #2) and have already
prepared some osm files to start the import process (See #3). I’ve
commented on the project at talk-es and a local telegram group.<br></p><p style="margin-bottom:0cm;line-height:100%;background:transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><a name="m_-2734843673244182903_firstHeading" rel="noopener noreferrer"></a>I detail galician protected areas categories and how
we’d apply “<span lang="en-US">boundary=protected_area” </span><span lang="en-US">to
them on the wiki.</span><br></p><p style="margin-bottom:0cm;line-height:100%;background:transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><i style="font-style:italic"><span style="font-style:normal">I’d</span></i><i style="font-style:italic"><span style="font-style:normal"> appreciate</span></i><span style="font-style:normal"> </span><span style="font-style:normal">your</span><span style="font-style:normal"> </span><i style="font-style:italic"><span style="font-style:normal">feedback.</span></i><br></p><p style="margin-bottom:0cm;line-height:100%;background:transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><i style="font-style:italic"><span style="font-style:normal">---</span></i><br></p><p style="margin-bottom:0cm;line-height:100%;background:transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%">(1) <a style="color:rgb(0,0,128);text-decoration:underline" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IET_Import#License" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IET_Import#License</a> (CC BY 4.0 license with a ODBL permission)<br></p><p style="margin-bottom:0cm;line-height:100%;background:transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%">(2) <a style="color:rgb(0,0,128);text-decoration:underline" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IET_Import_-_Protected_Areas" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IET_Import_-_Protected_Areas</a><br></p><p style="margin-bottom:0cm;line-height:100%;background:transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%">(3) <a style="color:rgb(0,0,128);text-decoration:underline" href="https://gitlab.com/mbranco/iet-import-protected-areas" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://gitlab.com/mbranco/iet-import-protected-areas</a><br></p></div></blockquote><div><br></div> </div>
</blockquote></div>