<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>5 Feb 2021, 09:39 by squinterog75@gmail.com:</div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div><span style="color: rgb(32, 33, 36); font-variant-ligatures: none; letter-spacing: 0.1px; white-space: pre-wrap;"><span class="font" style="font-family:Roboto, Arial, sans-serif"><span class="size" style="font-size:16px">-We have an official, well-organized, documented, reliable, verifiable and accurate source of data > No verifiability problems. </span></span></span><br></div></div></blockquote><div>It is not so simple. <br></div><div><br></div><div>OSM is not just copy of official data.<br></div><div><br></div><div>What if someone disagrees with how</div><div>this official dataset marks mountain<br></div><div>ranges?<br></div><div><br></div><div>How one may verify which version</div><div>is correct?<br></div><div><br></div><div>What if multiple people or sources differ</div><div>in how mountain ranges are located?<br></div><div><br></div><div>I would expect gigantic verifiability</div><div>issues here, and without resolving that</div><div>I would recommend not importing that.<br></div><div><br></div><div>And "we copy official data, everything else</div><div>will be reverted, changes are not allowed"<br></div><div>is not a good solution.</div> </body>
</html>