<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Mar 8, 2022, 10:00 by frederik@remote.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Hi,<br></div><div><br></div><div>On 3/8/22 01:39, Matheus Gomes wrote:<br></div><blockquote>Regarding the fdep:landuse_code, I have the opinion that this is a valid and important information to be retained on OSM.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I disagree with that. It increases the data volume greatly and leads to "WTF" moments for future mappers when you have two adjacent polygons sharing a boundary and both are (e.g.) "landuse=forest" in OSM - just because they used to have different fdep:landuse_codes originally.<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">+1<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">- fdep:landuse_code cannot be really trusted anyway, as people can modify geometries<br></div><div dir="auto">(iD mappers will not even see it)<br></div><div dir="auto">- it discourages mappers from editing landuse<br></div><div dir="auto">- based on my personal experience, such tags are thoroughly useless<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Also, if checking fdep:landuse_code is necessary to understand what is going on<br></div><div dir="auto">then it means that data was imported badly.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">(nevertheless I am on opposite side of the globe - but based on my experience<br></div><div dir="auto">I really dislike such tags and consider them as harmful)<br></div> </body>
</html>