<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>On 10/2/2022 7:24 PM, Mike Thompson wrote:<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CALJoUku8M7ZvcXW_hU02Rm-xcpm7Ycu6BymrrOCoi11rOeg5ug@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
I do see that "public refrigerated warehouses" are on that list.
You listed the quality as "good" and "good for import." As
detailed earlier, that was not my finding, which leads me to
believe that we have different standards for "good", and leads me
to question other cases where you said quality was "good." <br>
</blockquote>
This is mainly what I was referring to when I said "<font
color="#ffffff">when I reassess quality for the datasets, I may
make the number even smaller." When I initially assessed this
dataset, I took a quick look at a few objects and determined that
they were of sufficient quality to be considered for import. I've
removed that dataset from the candidate list.</font><br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CALJoUku8M7ZvcXW_hU02Rm-xcpm7Ycu6BymrrOCoi11rOeg5ug@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Also, I see "PAD-US" is "in progress." Does that mean that
the import has actually started? I don't recall seeing it
discussed on this list.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I set this one as in progress because I had already found another
wiki page where other mappers were already working to have the
data imported:</p>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Public_lands/PAD-US">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Public_lands/PAD-US</a><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CALJoUku8M7ZvcXW_hU02Rm-xcpm7Ycu6BymrrOCoi11rOeg5ug@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Also, where are these "specific instructions"? I didn't
see them on the wiki page. Perhaps I missed it.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>All of the datasets I've written documentation for are on
subpages in order to keep it neat. I've worked on these two
categories in particular:</p>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HIFLD/Finance">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HIFLD/Finance</a></p>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HIFLD/Communications">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HIFLD/Communications</a></p>
<p>They're linked in the main data categories list, but they can be
easy to miss.<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CALJoUku8M7ZvcXW_hU02Rm-xcpm7Ycu6BymrrOCoi11rOeg5ug@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>I think this is already documented in the HIFLD
data's metadata. What I recommend is that we go back to the
original source and get their data, rather than using the
HIFLD data. This will not always be possible, but in some
cases it clearly will be.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Fine by me :)</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>-James Crawford (SherbetS)<br>
</p>
<br>
</body>
</html>