<div dir="ltr">Thanks everyone for the thoughtful replies. For now, I'll consider this import blocked until the license issues can be resolved satisfactorily. The City of Redmond has a similar data set with similar licensing so I'll also reach out to them. Ultimately, if this falls through that's fine with me. I can take what I've learned and work on another import from a less encumbered source.<div><br></div><div>Matt (watmildon)</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 9:08 AM Richard Welty <<a href="mailto:rwelty@averillpark.net">rwelty@averillpark.net</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On 11/25/22 11:54 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:<br>
> <br>
> Minh Nguyen <<a href="mailto:minh@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us" target="_blank">minh@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us</a>> writes:<br>
<br>
> And, in this case, it's not just that we can have a disclaimer. These<br>
> terms are required to be followed when OSM redistributes, under the text<br>
> ofthe King County license as I read it.<br>
<br>
redistribution requirements are a disqualifier, because redistribution<br>
is something that OSM does not and cannot control. there are potential<br>
imports that i dropped because of redistribution requirements.<br>
<br>
richard<br>
<br>
-- <br>
<a href="mailto:rwelty@averillpark.net" target="_blank">rwelty@averillpark.net</a><br>
Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting<br>
OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux<br>
Java - Web Applications - Search<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Imports mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Imports@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Imports@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports</a><br>
</blockquote></div>