[josm-dev] validator question, multipolygons
niceman at att.net
Sat Mar 5 17:37:02 GMT 2011
On 3/5/2011 12:05 PM, Russ Nelson wrote:
> I agree. What might work for better nannying is to only run the
> validator on things they've changed. Otherwise they get asked to fix
> everything within the bounding box they downloaded.
? It already works this way for me.
> Even better than that would be to do validation continuously. Much
> better to catch an error right away.
That gets back to excessive chatter because there's no way to know
the difference between a work in progress that involves several elements
VS a complete edit and moving on.
More information about the josm-dev