[OSM-legal-talk] OS Opendata & the new license
osm at inbox.org
Fri Oct 1 18:49:35 BST 2010
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Rob Myers <rob at robmyers.org> wrote:
> On 10/01/2010 04:01 PM, Anthony wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:31 AM, Rob Myers<rob at robmyers.org> wrote:
>>> At worst we have conflicting reports. I'll take
>>> legal advice over reported email comments in that case, though.
>> That's fine for the half dozen (?) of you who have access to that
>> legal advice. But for the tens of thousands of us who only have
>> access to the conflicting legal advice...
> I have no access to the legal advice. I'm simply trusting that the emails I
> read on this list are correct (that the LWG have legal advice, and that
> other people have email contact with the OS).
So you're actually taking reported email comments over legal advice,
and not the other way around.
> I am Assuming Good faith. ;-)
I don't think the emails I read on this list are lies. But that's a
lot different from thinking that they're correct.
More information about the legal-talk