[OSM-legal-talk] "Natural person" in CT 3
richard at weait.com
Mon Sep 20 23:10:59 BST 2010
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:58 PM, andrzej zaborowski <balrogg at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 20 September 2010 23:26, John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 21 September 2010 06:38, Ulf Möller <osm at ulfm.de> wrote:
>>> On the other hand, if someone has two accounts, we probably can rely on the
>>> honor system.
>> Currently it's being suggested that people create a second account so
>> they can agree to the CTs, this doesn't seem to be the sort of thing
>> that people should be told, since agreeing to the CTs is supposed to
>> cover a person not an account.
> The Active Contributor definition covers a person, not an account.
> The rest of the CT is a contract covering "Content" which I assume is
> anything uploaded under the specific account, although it isn't made
CTs are per account. Active Contributors are per person.
More information about the legal-talk