<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman,new york,times,serif;font-size:12pt"><div><br></div><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><br><div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><hr size="1"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> OJ W <ojwlists@googlemail.com><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span></b><br></font>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Mikel Maron <<a ymailto="mailto:mikel_maron@yahoo.com" href="mailto:mikel_maron@yahoo.com">mikel_maron@yahoo.com</a>> wrote:<br>> > The license won't be perfect, but there will be a process for feedback and<br>> > improvements, and the license will get there.<br>> <br>> This phraseology sounds very businesslike. I'm sure I've heard the<br>> "we know x is dismal but
we've agreed to it anyway" phrase many times<br>> at work, often followed by "if we suddenly find ourselves with nothing<br>> better to do in the future, we might consider improving it"<br>> <br>> (not a comment on the proposed license, just on the email justifying it)<br><br>Wow, I sounds business-y. Guess I was being careful with the phrasing. <br><br>Though I'm sure that "won't be perfect" is not that the same as "dismal".<br><br>Anyhow, dudes, I'll try to sound more unprofessional in future emails.<br><br>-Mikel<br></div></div></div></body></html>