<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Rob Myers <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rob@robmyers.org">rob@robmyers.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On 11/19/2010 02:47 PM, Rob Myers wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
So if what Christine O'Donnell^D^D^Dyou are saying is correct the ODbL<br>
doesn't allow you to make proprietary produced works either.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
And, while I have the text of BY-SA 2.0 generic open in front of me, I can't find any mention of the words "map", "cartography", "geodata" or "database" in the licence that OSM currently uses.<br>
</blockquote><div><br>And if you had the text of BY-SA 3.0 open in front of you, then you'd see that it has a lot to say about these matters:<br><br><strong>"Work"</strong> means the literary and/or
artistic work offered under the terms of this License
including without limitation any production in the
literary, scientific and artistic domain, <b>whatever may be
the mode or form of its expression</b> including ... an illustration, <b>map</b>,
plan, sketch or three-dimensional work relative to
<b>geography</b>, topography, architecture or science; ..."<br><br>Hmm, perhaps we could use a license like this...<br></div></div><br>