<html>
<body>
And to confirm ... the new phrase was introduced by mistake when
initially setting up the 1.1 draft document and carried over into 1.2. I
have removed it and checked all the other wording, though I'd certainly
appreciate another check. The only difference between the proposed
1.2 text:<br><br>
<a href="http://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_933xs7nvfb">
http://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_933xs7nvfb</a> <br><br>
and currently released 1.0 text<br><br>
<a href="http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Contributor_Terms" eudora="autourl">
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Contributor_Terms</a><br><br>
should be diff-marked with colour highlighting and strike-outs.
<br><br>
Mike<br><br>
At 07:39 PM 5/12/2010, Mike Collinson wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Before this thread goes any
further,Yes, a cock-up I believe, possibly mine. The un-highlighted
text should be the same as CT 1.0. Thank you fx99 for pointing it
out. Will investigate.<br><br>
Mike<br><br>
At 03:39 PM 3/12/2010, Richard Fairhurst wrote:<br><br>
>David Groom wrote:<br>
>> If the OSMF board wish to move OSM to PD<br>
><br>
>They don't, rendering the rest of your e-mail moot. I mean,
personally I<br>
>think it'd be lovely if they did, but they don't. I'm slightly amazed
that<br>
>anyone can consider this who has ever read any licence-related
postings by<br>
>the chairman of the OSMF board, who has, let's say, a slight
preference for<br>
>share-alike and is, shall we also say, not too shy to come forward
with his<br>
>views.<br>
><br>
>Rather, as Francis pointed out: "A mistake? Someone
infelicitously drafting<br>
>the licence? It does happen you know :-)."<br>
><br>
>Or, as ever with OSM, never attribute to conspiracy that which can
be<br>
>adequately explained by cock-up.<br>
><br>
>Richard<br>
><br>
><br>
>-- <br>
>View this message in context:
<a href="http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/New-phrase-in-section-2-tp5793972p5800255.html" eudora="autourl">
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/New-phrase-in-section-2-tp5793972p5800255.html</a>
<br>
>Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.<br>
><br>
>_______________________________________________<br>
>legal-talk mailing list<br>
>legal-talk@openstreetmap.org<br>
><a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk" eudora="autourl">
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk</a><br><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
legal-talk mailing list<br>
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org<br>
<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk" eudora="autourl">
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk</a></blockquote></body>
</html>