<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18975">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Mike</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>insection 4 </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>"<FONT face="Times New Roman">4. At Your or the
copyright holder’s option,</FONT>" probably should be "You" not
"Your"</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>David</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=mike@ayeltd.biz href="mailto:mike@ayeltd.biz">Mike Collinson</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
href="mailto:legal-talk@openstreetmap.org">Licensing and other legal
discussions.</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, December 07, 2010 8:44
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New phrase
in section 2</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>And to confirm ... the new phrase was introduced by mistake
when initially setting up the 1.1 draft document and carried over into 1.2. I
have removed it and checked all the other wording, though I'd certainly
appreciate another check. The only difference between the proposed
1.2 text:<BR><BR><A
href="http://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_933xs7nvfb">http://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_933xs7nvfb</A>
<BR><BR>and currently released 1.0 text<BR><BR><A
href="http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Contributor_Terms"
eudora="autourl">http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Contributor_Terms</A><BR><BR>should
be diff-marked with colour highlighting and strike-outs.
<BR><BR>Mike<BR><BR>At 07:39 PM 5/12/2010, Mike Collinson wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=cite cite="" type="cite">Before this thread goes any
further,Yes, a cock-up I believe, possibly mine. The un-highlighted
text should be the same as CT 1.0. Thank you fx99 for pointing it out.
Will investigate.<BR><BR>Mike<BR><BR>At 03:39 PM 3/12/2010, Richard
Fairhurst wrote:<BR><BR>>David Groom wrote:<BR>>> If the OSMF board
wish to move OSM to PD<BR>><BR>>They don't, rendering the rest of your
e-mail moot. I mean, personally I<BR>>think it'd be lovely if they did,
but they don't. I'm slightly amazed that<BR>>anyone can consider this who
has ever read any licence-related postings by<BR>>the chairman of the
OSMF board, who has, let's say, a slight preference for<BR>>share-alike
and is, shall we also say, not too shy to come forward with
his<BR>>views.<BR>><BR>>Rather, as Francis pointed out: "A mistake?
Someone infelicitously drafting<BR>>the licence? It does happen you know
:-)."<BR>><BR>>Or, as ever with OSM, never attribute to conspiracy
that which can be<BR>>adequately explained by
cock-up.<BR>><BR>>Richard<BR>><BR>><BR>>-- <BR>>View this
message in context: <A
href="http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/New-phrase-in-section-2-tp5793972p5800255.html"
eudora="autourl">http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/New-phrase-in-section-2-tp5793972p5800255.html</A>
<BR>>Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.<BR>><BR>>_______________________________________________<BR>>legal-talk
mailing list<BR>>legal-talk@openstreetmap.org<BR>><A
href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk" eudora="autourl">
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk</A><BR><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>legal-talk
mailing list<BR>legal-talk@openstreetmap.org<BR><A
href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk"
eudora="autourl">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk</A></BLOCKQUOTE>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>legal-talk mailing
list<BR>legal-talk@openstreetmap.org<BR>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<br><br></BODY></HTML>