<html>
<body>
Nope. Clause 4 survives any license changes in the future, it is nothing
to do with the end user license:<br><br>
4. At Your or the copyright owner’s holder’s option, OSMF agrees to
attribute You or the copyright owner holder. A mechanism will be
provided, currently a web page
<a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution">
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution</a>. <br><br>
Mike<br><br>
At 04:42 PM 6/01/2011, John Smith wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Which clause 3
contradicts<br><br>
On 1/7/11, Mike Collinson <mike@ayeltd.biz> wrote:<br>
> At 03:32 PM 6/01/2011, John Smith wrote:<br>
>>On 7 January 2011 00:45, Mike Collinson <mike@ayeltd.biz>
wrote:<br>
>>> Clause 4 of the new CTs may cover us completely, [it was
designed for<br>
>>> governmental organisations] and I have updated<br>
>><br>
>>IMHO, section 4 is useless unless there is some kind of clause
stating<br>
>>what will happen if the license changes in future.<br>
><br>
> Clause 4 is part of the Contributor Terms. That is the point. It
survives<br>
> any license changes in the future.<br>
><br>
> Mike<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> legal-talk mailing list<br>
> legal-talk@openstreetmap.org<br>
>
<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk" eudora="autourl">
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk</a><br>
><br><br>
-- <br>
Sent from my mobile device<br><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
legal-talk mailing list<br>
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org<br>
<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk" eudora="autourl">
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk</a></blockquote></body>
</html>