<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
I've produced some numbers to getter a better grip on and if the PD
"issue" has any real significance.<br>
<br>
I found 476 mappers in the PD or CC0 categories, of these (using a
simple lower case name comparison), I was able to determine the UID
of 375. Obviously there is some potential for errors because there
is no one to one relationship between UIDs/OSM logins and wiki user
names.<br>
<br>
Of the 375, 304 have accepted the CTs.<br>
<br>
5 (five) have refused.<br>
<br>
And 66 haven't decided yet.<br>
<br>
With the same list of 476 mappers I ran a modified version of my V1
script that gave the following numbers for objects created by "PD"
mappers:<br>
<br>
Nodes: 1'195'041 (0.11%)<br>
Highways: 92'374 (0.22%)<br>
Other ways: 74'139 (0.13%)<br>
Routes: 255 (0.20%)<br>
Other rel: 3'740 (0.42%)<br>
<br>
And a total of 42 "PD" mappers that actually still have V1 objects
in the database.<br>
<br>
Notes:<br>
- the numbers are based on the full history planet from 2011-06-19,
license data from the 2011-09-08<br>
<br>
- the numbers include TimSC, whose contributions, as we know, are
not really PD.<br>
<br>
Simon<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:4E574CFA.4070601@poole.ch" type="cite">
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>