<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Iván Sánchez Ortega <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ivan@sanchezortega.es" target="_blank">ivan@sanchezortega.es</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">> Would it make a difference if the business is a large chain and had more<br><div class="im">
> than one address (possible a lot more than one address) on its website?<br>
<br>
</div>In that case, you're doing a repeated extraction of non-substantial amounts of
data. And that's perfectly OK to do under european law (and you retain all
copyrights of the derived work of your repeated extraction).<br></blockquote></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">I'm not sure it has to do with "non-substantial amounts of data". But business websites publishing their own address or list of addresses is reallly intended to be shared and republished everywhere. It would be different if the website is e.g. a directory of all shops of a given city and their opening hours. Even if you extract only the pharmacies/drugstores and it is a non-substantial amount of data, you will copy their work of collecting this information.<br>
<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Pieren<br></div></div>