<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
It seems as if we inadvertently CC's this to the public legal-talk
list and not to the LWG one.<br>
<br>
Apologies to all.<br>
<br>
Simon<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 09.07.2013 21:56, schrieb Simon
Poole:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:51DC6AD1.6030603@poole.ch" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
Sorry for missing the meeting got my times confused, It is a
definite yes from me. There is a "term" in singular that should be
plural I believe. But otherwise completely ok with me.<br>
<br>
Simon<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 09.07.2013 20:38, schrieb Michael
Collinson:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:51DC588D.9090703@ayeltd.biz" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
Simon,<br>
<br>
Oliver, Dermot and I have give a finally look over the document
and are happy to now send it to the board as our formal
proposal. However, as Chair I would really prefer a formal
quorate, 4, for such things and ask you to indicate yes or no by
email before I send it.<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://docs.google.com/a/osmfoundation.org/document/d/1uQ0hpkFxqdNf7aPMk_5PaHFZojxULMcWXxLJRbYq4oE/edit"
style="text-decoration:none;"
id="docs-internal-guid-161a45e5-c4ae-00f3-cb70-4de0c291c0f6"><span
style="font-size:13px;font-family:Verdana;color:#1155cc;background-color:transparent;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:underline;vertical-align:baseline;">https://docs.google.com/a/osmfoundation.org/document/d/1uQ0hpkFxqdNf7aPMk_5PaHFZojxULMcWXxLJRbYq4oE/edit</span></a><span
style="font-size:13px;font-family:Verdana;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;">
</span><br>
<br>
The draft is of the last meeting + your changes + we went
through and considered and clarified what each "OpenStreetMap"
meant. As an interesting aside, it defines "OpenStreetMap"
without qualification to be the database itself rather than any
human entity ... may be a useful legal construct in the future.<br>
<br>
I also intend forwarding it to the Japanese community since
treatment of disputed-island naming is an issue there as it ties
the hands of the national mapping agency on how cooperative they
can be with us. If I get any substantial feedback, I will
forward to board.<br>
<br>
Mike<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:legal-talk@openstreetmap.org">legal-talk@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>