<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05/05/2014 16:32, Martin
Koppenhoefer wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTBU3TDzMvNMe=is7+6cxtXU2Wwe=LdWVbiGa4-y8v8Mcg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2014-05-05 14:05 GMT+02:00 Tobias
Knerr <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:osm@tobias-knerr.de" target="_blank">osm@tobias-knerr.de</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="">> *And share-alike only applies to what
we collect.*<br>
<br>
</div>
Let me first say that this is a brilliantly clear way to
put it. I like<br>
this a lot.</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
I believe this is somehow more limiting than what we actually
might want. E.g. we don't collect traffic data, but if there
was a company which used our data as basemap and associated
average speeds for time spans to our graph (e.g. automatically
from the analysis of their users / smartphones) I think we
would be interested to get this data to improve our routing.<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Usefulness to Openstreetmap is orthogonal to the ODBL.<br>
<br>
That traffic data might relate to way identifiers, but it does not
improve or even modify Openstreetmap data - so I fail to see how
Openstreetmap might lay claim on a map showing traffic over
Openstreetmap highways.<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>